1
00:00:00,652 --> 00:00:04,652
I cannot wait to see this.

2
00:00:04,652 --> 00:00:05,652
Pretty amazing.

3
00:00:05,652 --> 00:00:06,652
Waiting for a long time.

4
00:00:06,652 --> 00:00:08,652
I mean, it's almost unheard of.

5
00:00:08,652 --> 00:00:11,651
I have never seen one in person.

6
00:00:11,651 --> 00:00:14,651
Wow. Incredible.

7
00:00:14,651 --> 00:00:16,651
That is...

8
00:00:16,651 --> 00:00:17,651
Freaky.

9
00:00:17,651 --> 00:00:18,651
Odd, right?

10
00:00:18,651 --> 00:00:23,651
Are extraterrestrial artifacts being dismissed by scholars?

11
00:00:23,651 --> 00:00:29,650
This object had a date of 140 million years.

12
00:00:29,650 --> 00:00:33,650
Is our scientific process flawed?

13
00:00:33,650 --> 00:00:37,650
Scientists are far too quick to put a period at the end of the sentence,

14
00:00:37,650 --> 00:00:39,650
and this is a problem.

15
00:00:39,650 --> 00:00:43,649
Will we be forced to rewrite our history books?

16
00:00:43,649 --> 00:00:45,649
The findings are undeniable.

17
00:00:45,649 --> 00:00:46,649
We are not alone.

18
00:00:46,649 --> 00:00:51,649
Exitrestral human-like groups have been visiting us all along.

19
00:00:51,649 --> 00:00:53,649
Looks amazing.

20
00:00:59,648 --> 00:01:04,648
New York City

21
00:01:04,648 --> 00:01:11,648
New York City

22
00:01:11,648 --> 00:01:20,647
February 2017

23
00:01:20,647 --> 00:01:27,647
At New York University

24
00:01:27,647 --> 00:01:29,647
New York City

25
00:01:29,647 --> 00:01:33,646
February 2017

26
00:01:33,646 --> 00:01:35,646
At New York University

27
00:01:35,646 --> 00:01:39,646
Georgiosuchelos meets with art collector Jared Collins,

28
00:01:39,646 --> 00:01:44,646
who is in possession of a 2,000-year-old elongated skull.

29
00:01:44,646 --> 00:01:49,645
Oh, wow. That is fantastic.

30
00:01:49,645 --> 00:01:52,645
The skull is incredibly well-preserved,

31
00:01:52,645 --> 00:01:55,645
and Jared is having it tested at the university

32
00:01:55,645 --> 00:01:59,645
to find out if it might possibly contain abnormalities

33
00:01:59,645 --> 00:02:02,645
that indicate it is something other than human.

34
00:02:02,645 --> 00:02:06,644
He agreed to meet Georgio outside of the anthropology lab

35
00:02:06,644 --> 00:02:09,644
for a first look at the skull.

36
00:02:09,644 --> 00:02:11,644
So how did this come to be in your possession?

37
00:02:11,644 --> 00:02:14,644
Well, it's not actually mine. It is on loan to me.

38
00:02:14,644 --> 00:02:16,644
Me and one of my colleagues contacted a museum,

39
00:02:16,644 --> 00:02:18,644
and we asked them,

40
00:02:18,644 --> 00:02:21,643
do you have an elongated skull in your collection?

41
00:02:21,643 --> 00:02:24,643
And they said they have just one. This one.

42
00:02:24,643 --> 00:02:27,643
And have they told you anything about it?

43
00:02:27,643 --> 00:02:28,643
Actually, like the provenance?

44
00:02:28,643 --> 00:02:32,643
Strangely, this has been in storage for decades.

45
00:02:32,643 --> 00:02:34,643
They have never tested it.

46
00:02:34,643 --> 00:02:36,643
They had very little information on it.

47
00:02:36,643 --> 00:02:39,642
They know it's absolutely paracus.

48
00:02:39,642 --> 00:02:42,642
So this skull was found in the paracus region of Peru?

49
00:02:42,642 --> 00:02:44,642
That's right.

50
00:02:44,642 --> 00:02:47,642
But no real modern testing has ever been done on this.

51
00:02:47,642 --> 00:02:50,642
Oh, this is amazing. So let's go, right?

52
00:02:50,642 --> 00:02:52,642
Okay.

53
00:02:52,642 --> 00:02:56,641
NYU professor of anthropology, Dr. Todd Disotel,

54
00:02:56,641 --> 00:03:00,641
agreed to conduct a forensic evaluation of the elongated skull.

55
00:03:00,641 --> 00:03:03,641
I've seen casts. I've never seen one in person.

56
00:03:03,641 --> 00:03:05,641
Okay.

57
00:03:05,641 --> 00:03:07,641
Wow.

58
00:03:07,641 --> 00:03:10,641
That is freaky.

59
00:03:10,641 --> 00:03:13,640
I mean, I just can't come up with another term.

60
00:03:13,640 --> 00:03:15,640
I love that your first reaction is that it's freaky,

61
00:03:15,640 --> 00:03:17,640
because I agree with you.

62
00:03:17,640 --> 00:03:19,640
Look at it.

63
00:03:19,640 --> 00:03:21,640
It's quite bizarre.

64
00:03:21,640 --> 00:03:25,640
I can see that this is a relatively young individual.

65
00:03:25,640 --> 00:03:27,639
How did you determine that, for example?

66
00:03:27,639 --> 00:03:29,639
Well, so by looking at the teeth,

67
00:03:29,639 --> 00:03:33,639
we have some deciduous or some baby teeth remaining.

68
00:03:33,639 --> 00:03:36,639
It doesn't yet have its third molar,

69
00:03:36,639 --> 00:03:40,639
which typically comes in around 18 years old or so.

70
00:03:40,639 --> 00:03:43,639
So I would guess that this is somewhere

71
00:03:43,639 --> 00:03:46,638
maybe 12 to 14 years old.

72
00:03:46,638 --> 00:03:48,638
Really?

73
00:03:48,638 --> 00:03:52,638
Let me just move it over to the sterile bench surface.

74
00:03:52,638 --> 00:03:54,638
Wow.

75
00:03:54,638 --> 00:03:58,638
So it's very fascinating, besides the shape.

76
00:03:58,638 --> 00:04:05,637
The sad little suture looks like it has completely fused.

77
00:04:05,637 --> 00:04:07,637
If it's an adolescent, maybe 12 years old,

78
00:04:07,637 --> 00:04:10,637
isn't that quite young to have a fusion?

79
00:04:10,637 --> 00:04:12,637
It is, but I'm holding it.

80
00:04:12,637 --> 00:04:14,637
I'm looking at it.

81
00:04:14,637 --> 00:04:17,636
And it's just been completely obliterated.

82
00:04:17,636 --> 00:04:20,636
The sagittal suture is the scene

83
00:04:20,636 --> 00:04:25,636
where the two parietal bones of the skull come together.

84
00:04:25,636 --> 00:04:30,636
Although the markings may be faint due to fusing over time,

85
00:04:30,636 --> 00:04:35,635
all human skulls are expected to have some evidence of this feature.

86
00:04:35,635 --> 00:04:39,635
So it is curious that this skull does not.

87
00:04:39,635 --> 00:04:42,635
Nor do the skulls of an adult.

88
00:04:42,635 --> 00:04:46,635
Nor do the skulls of a number of other mysterious specimens

89
00:04:46,635 --> 00:04:51,634
that have been collected and examined by various experts.

90
00:04:51,634 --> 00:04:54,634
One of the great enigmas of planet Earth

91
00:04:54,634 --> 00:04:57,634
is that all over the world,

92
00:04:57,634 --> 00:05:06,634
we find skeletons with people having these elongated skulls.

93
00:05:06,634 --> 00:05:09,633
For centuries, various native cultures have engaged

94
00:05:09,633 --> 00:05:14,633
in the ritual practice of artificially elongating their skulls

95
00:05:14,633 --> 00:05:19,633
by tightly wrapping the heads of their children through infancy.

96
00:05:19,633 --> 00:05:24,632
However, these skulls still feature evidence of the cranial sutures.

97
00:05:24,632 --> 00:05:30,632
You also have the whole speculation of why people were doing the head binding

98
00:05:30,632 --> 00:05:33,632
and the artificial elongation anyway.

99
00:05:33,632 --> 00:05:35,632
Why were they doing that?

100
00:05:35,632 --> 00:05:38,632
They wanted to have these elongated skulls,

101
00:05:38,632 --> 00:05:44,631
and to them it represented the elite, the gods, the rulers.

102
00:05:44,631 --> 00:05:49,631
And you have to wonder if there was a race here on Earth

103
00:05:49,631 --> 00:05:55,631
with these elongated heads and were they extraterrestrials?

104
00:05:55,631 --> 00:06:00,630
Okay, let's move on to extracting some tooth and bone powder

105
00:06:00,630 --> 00:06:03,630
to get DNA out of that.

106
00:06:03,630 --> 00:06:05,630
Okay, excellent.

107
00:06:05,630 --> 00:06:10,630
In order to obtain the needed genetic material from the artifact,

108
00:06:10,630 --> 00:06:17,629
Dr. Disotel will need to remove a tooth and drill into it to extract the samples.

109
00:06:17,629 --> 00:06:21,629
The analysis of the material will determine the sex,

110
00:06:21,629 --> 00:06:24,629
ancestral lineage of both the father and the mother,

111
00:06:24,629 --> 00:06:33,628
and any DNA anomalies when compared with the current human genetic database.

112
00:06:33,628 --> 00:06:35,628
Looks pretty good.

113
00:06:35,628 --> 00:06:38,628
So we will pack this up and send it off,

114
00:06:38,628 --> 00:06:42,628
and in four to six weeks they should have the result.

115
00:06:42,628 --> 00:06:44,628
Four to six weeks, okay.

116
00:06:44,628 --> 00:06:46,627
Thank you very much. Really appreciate your input on this.

117
00:06:46,627 --> 00:06:47,627
Take care.

118
00:06:47,627 --> 00:06:48,627
Thanks a lot.

119
00:06:48,627 --> 00:06:49,627
You got it.

120
00:06:49,627 --> 00:06:57,627
For hundreds of years, researchers have been confronted with numerous scientific anomalies.

121
00:06:57,627 --> 00:07:01,627
But traditional science is often intolerant of evidence

122
00:07:01,627 --> 00:07:06,626
that doesn't fit neatly within accepted frameworks.

123
00:07:06,626 --> 00:07:08,626
Because of these prejudices,

124
00:07:08,626 --> 00:07:15,626
could we be missing a greater truth about mankind's origins?

125
00:07:15,626 --> 00:07:18,626
I think scientists need to look at these things

126
00:07:18,626 --> 00:07:22,625
and instead of just dismissing it offhand right away,

127
00:07:22,625 --> 00:07:26,625
to be like, wait a second, maybe we are not the first,

128
00:07:26,625 --> 00:07:29,625
maybe another civilization did exist.

129
00:07:29,625 --> 00:07:32,625
Perhaps there is an extraterrestrial connection,

130
00:07:32,625 --> 00:07:35,625
because clearly we have a mystery there,

131
00:07:35,625 --> 00:07:37,624
and everybody is looking the other way.

132
00:07:42,624 --> 00:07:44,624
Glen Rose, Texas.

133
00:07:45,624 --> 00:07:50,624
This rural southern town has a population of only 2,500,

134
00:07:50,624 --> 00:07:58,623
but may hold one of the most incredible archaeological artifacts ever found.

135
00:07:58,623 --> 00:08:05,623
At the Creation Evidence Museum is an ancient hammer known as the London Artifact,

136
00:08:05,623 --> 00:08:11,622
named after the central Texas town where it was discovered in 1936.

137
00:08:11,622 --> 00:08:15,622
The hammer itself was found in the Travis Formation.

138
00:08:15,622 --> 00:08:17,622
It's a concretion of sandstone,

139
00:08:17,622 --> 00:08:21,622
and it usually takes about 140 million years for this to form.

140
00:08:21,622 --> 00:08:24,622
That would put it at 140 million years old.

141
00:08:25,621 --> 00:08:33,621
Mainstream scientists contend that the first modern humans emerged only 200,000 years ago.

142
00:08:33,621 --> 00:08:38,621
But if so, how is it possible that such an artifact exists?

143
00:08:39,621 --> 00:08:45,620
The hammer was scientifically analyzed in the 1980s by two independent labs.

144
00:08:45,620 --> 00:08:49,620
The Creation Science Foundation based in Australia,

145
00:08:49,620 --> 00:08:53,620
and the Battelle Memorial Laboratory in Columbus, Ohio.

146
00:08:54,620 --> 00:09:02,619
Incredibly, both labs concluded that the hammer could indeed be over 100 million years old.

147
00:09:02,619 --> 00:09:07,619
Part of the handle actually is starting to go through a process called colification.

148
00:09:07,619 --> 00:09:12,619
It's where you have inorganic material and organic material changing into coal.

149
00:09:12,619 --> 00:09:16,618
This is something that just simply can't happen in the span of say 100 years.

150
00:09:16,618 --> 00:09:20,618
Like most people saying, oh, this is nothing more than a hammer that was left behind

151
00:09:20,618 --> 00:09:24,618
by a would-be prospector from the mid-1800s.

152
00:09:26,618 --> 00:09:33,617
In addition to colification, the handle of the hammer shows signs of petrification.

153
00:09:33,617 --> 00:09:40,617
This process of the organic wood being replaced by mineral crystals takes millions of years.

154
00:09:41,617 --> 00:09:48,616
Test results concluded that the material on the hammerhead consisted of 96.6% iron,

155
00:09:48,616 --> 00:09:53,616
2.6% chlorine, and less than 1% sulfur.

156
00:09:54,616 --> 00:10:00,616
Incredibly, this material contained no carbon to indicate modern manufacturing.

157
00:10:01,616 --> 00:10:09,615
When we were making steel for tools, part of the process is to use a blast furnace to remove carbon.

158
00:10:10,615 --> 00:10:14,615
Out of it completely, but we always have about 0.2% to 2% left over.

159
00:10:14,615 --> 00:10:20,615
There's always a carbon signature on our steel, but there wasn't any carbon whatsoever that was found in this particular material.

160
00:10:21,614 --> 00:10:27,614
This object may be as old as 140 million years.

161
00:10:27,614 --> 00:10:33,614
And obviously, that's a crazy proposition if you think that modern-day archaeology suggests

162
00:10:33,614 --> 00:10:39,613
that we've only been around for about 10,000 years, you know, creating stuff with our own hands.

163
00:10:39,613 --> 00:10:48,613
So this falls into the category of out-of-place artifacts, artifacts that shouldn't exist.

164
00:10:49,613 --> 00:10:56,612
If the London Hammer really dates back to over 100 million years, as the data suggests,

165
00:10:56,612 --> 00:11:03,612
this find would have to fundamentally reshape our understanding of human development on planet Earth.

166
00:11:04,612 --> 00:11:12,611
But ancient astronaut theorists suggest there is another, much more substantial relic of the ancient world

167
00:11:12,611 --> 00:11:16,611
that is far older than mainstream archaeologists propose.

168
00:11:17,611 --> 00:11:20,611
The Great Pyramid of Giza.

169
00:11:24,611 --> 00:11:25,611
Giza, Egypt.

170
00:11:26,611 --> 00:11:35,610
Here on the west bank of the Nile stands the oldest of the seven wonders of the ancient world, the Great Pyramid.

171
00:11:37,610 --> 00:11:46,609
According to accepted history, the Great Pyramid was built around 2500 BC as a tomb for the Pharaoh Khufu.

172
00:11:47,609 --> 00:11:58,609
However, the dating of the pyramid and its association with Khufu is based entirely on evidence discovered in May of 1837

173
00:11:58,609 --> 00:12:02,608
by British explorer Richard Howard Weiss.

174
00:12:04,608 --> 00:12:14,608
Colonel Weiss basically used gunpowder to blast his way into a series of hidden chambers.

175
00:12:15,608 --> 00:12:25,607
And at the very top most of these chambers he allegedly found painted onto the stone roof blocks there the cartoos of King Khufu.

176
00:12:27,607 --> 00:12:35,606
Edytologists were then able to attribute the Great Pyramid to Khufu and the construction date of 2500 BC

177
00:12:35,606 --> 00:12:38,606
because that's when they believed Khufu reigned.

178
00:12:39,606 --> 00:12:49,606
Since stone cannot be carbon dated and no other inscriptions except for the Pharaoh's official monogram were found on the pyramid,

179
00:12:49,606 --> 00:12:53,605
this date has stood relatively unchallenged.

180
00:12:53,605 --> 00:13:02,605
However, new evidence that has been found in Colonel Weiss's personal journal has researchers questioning his discovery.

181
00:13:03,605 --> 00:13:09,604
Some have even suggested that he may have forged the name of Khufu himself.

182
00:13:10,604 --> 00:13:18,604
In Weiss's private journal, which I managed to view a couple of years ago, we find contradictions in his private notes.

183
00:13:18,604 --> 00:13:22,604
He was desperate to find a cartoos. On this particular night he writes,

184
00:13:22,604 --> 00:13:25,603
there was nothing in the chamber that looked like hieroglyphics.

185
00:13:26,603 --> 00:13:32,603
And then in his published book three years later he writes, we found the cartoos.

186
00:13:36,603 --> 00:13:49,602
After the contradicting evidence was exposed, in 2014, two University of Dresden archaeology students smuggled a sample of the paint used in the King Khufu markings

187
00:13:49,602 --> 00:13:52,602
and had it analyzed by a German laboratory.

188
00:13:52,602 --> 00:14:00,601
The sample was too small for radiocarbon dating, but the technicians were able to determine something shocking.

189
00:14:00,601 --> 00:14:08,601
The pigment was not painted onto the original limestone blocks, but a later plaster repair.

190
00:14:08,601 --> 00:14:18,600
This finding suggests that the cartoosh was not original to the pyramid construction, but added at a much later date.

191
00:14:20,600 --> 00:14:28,600
Colonel Weiss had spent nearly $1.3 million on his expedition to uncover truths about the Great Pyramid.

192
00:14:29,599 --> 00:14:39,599
Is it possible that in his desperation to find something, he did the unthinkable, that he may have forged the name of Khufu onto the chamber wall,

193
00:14:39,599 --> 00:14:43,599
thereby establishing an inaccurate date for the structure?

194
00:14:44,599 --> 00:14:53,598
Interestingly, this is not the only evidence contradicting the dating of the pyramid and the entire Giza complex.

195
00:14:54,598 --> 00:15:07,597
A 7th century BC text known as the Inventory Stela, unearthed by archaeologists in 1858, details repairs made by Pharaoh Khufu, including work on the sphinx.

196
00:15:08,597 --> 00:15:19,596
The Inventory Stela begs the question, how if Khufu was repairing the sphinx which was supposedly constructed by his son, how could he be doing that?

197
00:15:19,596 --> 00:15:25,596
That would suggest that the sphinx itself was already ancient at the time of Khufu.

198
00:15:28,596 --> 00:15:32,596
Could the dating of the entire Giza site be wrong?

199
00:15:32,596 --> 00:15:48,595
In 1992, Boston University geologist Robert Schock created a stir among Egyptologists when he suggested that based on the evidence of water erosion at the sphinx enclosure,

200
00:15:48,595 --> 00:15:53,594
he would date the site to approximately 10,500 BC.

201
00:15:54,594 --> 00:15:59,594
Immediately without even seeing my evidence, they start going, it doesn't go back that far.

202
00:15:59,594 --> 00:16:08,593
I was talking about real evidence, real science, which they simply did not want to hear because it did not fit their preconceptions.

203
00:16:10,593 --> 00:16:18,593
Like the sphinx, is it possible that the Great Pyramid is also far older than Egyptologists are willing to admit?

204
00:16:18,593 --> 00:16:22,593
But if so, just who built it?

205
00:16:23,593 --> 00:16:32,592
According to Arabian writers, Ibrahim Al-Makritsi, the Great Pyramid was not constructed by Khufu,

206
00:16:32,592 --> 00:16:39,592
the Great Pyramid was constructed long before the Great Flood by a king with the name of Saurid.

207
00:16:41,592 --> 00:16:50,591
And then the old Arabian writers clearly say Saurid is the same figure which the Hebrew society calls Inok.

208
00:16:51,591 --> 00:16:56,591
Inok was taken up into the heavens by the archangel Michael.

209
00:16:56,591 --> 00:17:00,590
He was told by the angels of a coming cataclysm.

210
00:17:00,590 --> 00:17:11,590
And he was instructed to build the Great Pyramid as a repository for the knowledge that he not only learned in heaven, but all the earthly knowledge as well.

211
00:17:11,590 --> 00:17:16,589
Perhaps these were otherworldly beings, described as angels.

212
00:17:17,589 --> 00:17:33,588
Maybe everything we know about Egyptology is wrong, and we have to go back and open up our imagination to the possibility that there's another explanation that in fact involves the assistance of extraterrestrials in the creation of the Great Pyramid.

213
00:17:34,588 --> 00:17:47,588
In November 2015, researchers at Giza scanned the Great Pyramid using thermal cameras and found two anomalous areas.

214
00:17:47,588 --> 00:17:58,587
They submitted a request to the Department of Antiquities to do a more formal investigation in hopes of locating what they believe might be hidden chambers.

215
00:17:59,587 --> 00:18:08,586
As scientists continue to discover new finds at the site, might they stumble upon the evidence that supports the ancient accounts?

216
00:18:08,586 --> 00:18:16,586
After all, this has happened before with the unearthing of a once mythical land.

217
00:18:17,586 --> 00:18:20,586
The Great Pyramid

218
00:18:24,585 --> 00:18:27,585
Hizarlik, Turkey, 1870.

219
00:18:28,585 --> 00:18:37,584
This small village is the site of one of the most sensational discoveries of the 19th century, the legendary City of Troy.

220
00:18:38,584 --> 00:18:46,584
The city was the infamous location for the Trojan War, described in the classic Greek epic, the Iliad.

221
00:18:48,584 --> 00:18:57,583
Prior to its discovery by amateur archaeologist Heinrich Schleeman, Troy was considered to be a mythical location.

222
00:18:58,583 --> 00:19:07,583
Heinrich Schleeman, a German businessman and pioneer, read Homer's Odyssey and the Iliad.

223
00:19:07,583 --> 00:19:16,582
He became convinced that Troy existed somewhere in Turkey where it is placed within the story.

224
00:19:16,582 --> 00:19:25,582
So he went out to Turkey and he asked the locals out there what they knew about the legends.

225
00:19:25,582 --> 00:19:30,581
And they eventually pointed him in the direction of a huge mount.

226
00:19:30,581 --> 00:19:37,581
So here he dug and he found the lost city of Troy itself.

227
00:19:38,581 --> 00:19:48,580
In addition to Troy, other cities that were previously relegated to the realm of mythology have also been discovered to be real.

228
00:19:49,580 --> 00:19:53,580
The Mediterranean Sea, 2000.

229
00:19:53,580 --> 00:20:04,579
A group of divers working off the Egyptian coast near Alexandria discovered the submerged ruins of statues and even entire temple complexes.

230
00:20:04,579 --> 00:20:12,579
One instance of the discovery of something that we thought was legendary was the discovery of Heraclion, Thonus, near Alexandria.

231
00:20:12,579 --> 00:20:20,578
We had read about this in Greek myth and Greek histories. We had no evidence for it and then one day it gets discovered.

232
00:20:21,578 --> 00:20:33,577
Dating back to the 7th century BC, Thonus, or Heraclion as it was known to the Greeks, was cited in ancient myths as a major trading post for the region.

233
00:20:34,577 --> 00:20:42,577
For a long time, Heraclion in Egypt was in many stories but had not been found until the year 2000.

234
00:20:42,577 --> 00:20:47,577
In India in the year 2001, something similar happened.

235
00:20:48,577 --> 00:20:55,576
The Mahabharata tells of the time Lord Vishnu built a great fortified city, Dvaraka.

236
00:20:55,576 --> 00:21:00,576
It was thought to be an imaginary place and then it was discovered.

237
00:21:01,576 --> 00:21:07,575
And before that, in the first half of the 20th century, there is another example.

238
00:21:07,575 --> 00:21:14,575
In the Bible, Joshua fought the battle of Jericho but we didn't know if there was a Jericho until it was discovered by archaeologists.

239
00:21:14,575 --> 00:21:19,575
This lets us know that there is more information in myth than we might have thought.

240
00:21:20,575 --> 00:21:37,574
But of all the places on earth that were thought to be mythological, the one that is inspired the most fascination and has proven the most elusive is not a city but an entire continent, Atlantis.

241
00:21:38,574 --> 00:21:51,573
As described by Plato in the 4th century AD, Atlantis was the home of a highly advanced civilization which mysteriously disappeared into the ocean thousands of years ago.

242
00:21:51,573 --> 00:22:03,572
While mainstream scholars continue to dismiss Atlantis as nothing more than a fanciful myth, there are many who believe Plato's account was based on a very real place.

243
00:22:04,572 --> 00:22:14,571
But if Atlantis, like other formerly mythical locations, were discovered, would it offer proof of extraterrestrial contact with early humans?

244
00:22:20,571 --> 00:22:24,571
Dunedin, New Zealand, February 2017.

245
00:22:25,571 --> 00:22:39,570
Scientists at New Zealand's top geological institute, G&S Science, announced the discovery of a lost continent, one that sunk into the ocean millions of years ago.

246
00:22:39,570 --> 00:22:45,570
They dubbed the landmass Zeelandia as it extends directly under New Zealand.

247
00:22:46,569 --> 00:23:01,569
Although it is almost entirely underwater, it fits the definition of a continent as it consists of an intact piece of crust that is distinctly different from the ocean floor and clearly separated from Australia.

248
00:23:03,568 --> 00:23:10,568
This was a shocking discovery because they thought the number of continents on earth had been basically fixed.

249
00:23:10,568 --> 00:23:16,568
Now this one looks like it could have been another continent where perhaps human beings dwelt.

250
00:23:16,568 --> 00:23:21,567
And if it was, this could certainly rewrite a lot of history books.

251
00:23:24,567 --> 00:23:27,567
Could this be the lost continent of Atlantis?

252
00:23:27,567 --> 00:23:32,567
Ancient astronaut theorists say that it is a distinct possibility.

253
00:23:32,567 --> 00:23:41,566
There is an ongoing bias among scientists that anything from the ancient past must therefore be a made up fake story myth.

254
00:23:41,566 --> 00:23:52,565
And yet, these scientists have to look at the reality that archaeological discoveries are verifying that the actual stories have merit.

255
00:24:03,565 --> 00:24:05,565
That's pretty amazing that we're able to do this.

256
00:24:15,564 --> 00:24:19,564
We're able to set up a CT scan? I mean, it's almost unheard of.

257
00:24:22,564 --> 00:24:23,564
Wow.

258
00:24:32,563 --> 00:24:34,563
This is a human skull.

259
00:24:34,563 --> 00:24:40,563
Giorgio and Jared have taken it to New York University's radiology department.

260
00:24:40,563 --> 00:24:43,562
There, it will be subjected to a CT scan.

261
00:24:43,562 --> 00:24:45,562
Yeah, let's see what's inside.

262
00:24:45,562 --> 00:24:53,562
Which should reveal whether or not the skull really is missing the suture or if it is simply not visible to the naked eye.

263
00:24:54,562 --> 00:25:04,561
During the procedure, a series of computerized x-ray images are taken from 360 degrees and stacked together to form a 3D image.

264
00:25:04,561 --> 00:25:10,561
If any hairline evidence of the missing suture exists, it will show up in the scan.

265
00:25:11,561 --> 00:25:12,561
It looks amazing.

266
00:25:12,561 --> 00:25:13,561
It is incredible.

267
00:25:13,561 --> 00:25:14,560
Isn't it incredible?

268
00:25:14,560 --> 00:25:15,560
Yeah.

269
00:25:15,560 --> 00:25:18,560
So these are surface rendered images to allow you to see the skull.

270
00:25:18,560 --> 00:25:23,560
For the sake of comparison, we have put similar images of an actual patient.

271
00:25:23,560 --> 00:25:24,560
Okay.

272
00:25:24,560 --> 00:25:31,559
So you can obviously see the teeth, the orbits where the eyes would sit, and you can see that it's a very deformed skull.

273
00:25:31,559 --> 00:25:35,559
Do you find any strange anomalies besides the shape, obviously?

274
00:25:35,559 --> 00:25:38,559
Well, there's a lot that's interesting about this.

275
00:25:38,559 --> 00:25:43,559
There's a sagittal suture that runs across the top of the skull that I'm not seeing on this skull.

276
00:25:43,559 --> 00:25:50,558
It's fused, but what is confounding to me is you can see the sutures in the other areas.

277
00:25:50,558 --> 00:25:59,558
And the fusing of a suture, is that something where if we were to look closer, would we see a remnant of that suture?

278
00:25:59,558 --> 00:26:02,558
We can look at it this way on these images.

279
00:26:02,558 --> 00:26:07,557
So you can see right here, there should be a sagittal suture right there and we're not seeing it.

280
00:26:07,557 --> 00:26:09,557
There's a lot of distortion, but I'll show you.

281
00:26:09,557 --> 00:26:14,557
This is what a suture elsewhere would look like. So these are the sutures elsewhere.

282
00:26:14,557 --> 00:26:19,557
Have you seen many skulls that have missing sutures?

283
00:26:19,557 --> 00:26:22,556
I've never seen anything like this skull.

284
00:26:25,556 --> 00:26:37,555
Ancient astronaut Theorists point out that science often has a difficult time with data, such as the missing sagittal sutures, that does not fit in to the accepted paradigm.

285
00:26:37,555 --> 00:26:47,555
And they suggest that findings that defy conventional explanation often get set aside instead of being investigated.

286
00:26:50,555 --> 00:26:56,554
St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada, Spring, 1970.

287
00:26:56,554 --> 00:27:05,554
Researchers at the Earth Sciences Department at Brock University receive a sample of wood that was found buried

288
00:27:05,554 --> 00:27:10,553
150 feet underground on an island off Nova Scotia.

289
00:27:10,553 --> 00:27:20,553
After scientists run carbon dating tests on the material, they place the object as being from 3,000 years in the future.

290
00:27:20,553 --> 00:27:27,552
Confounded, the team runs the test again, only to get the exact same results.

291
00:27:27,552 --> 00:27:32,552
Since it's an organic piece of material, they were able to date it.

292
00:27:32,552 --> 00:27:42,552
But the dates that they received completely contradicted everything because it had a date of 3,000 years into the future.

293
00:27:42,552 --> 00:27:45,551
Well, how is that possible?

294
00:27:47,551 --> 00:27:55,551
How is it that modern dating techniques can produce results that are so obviously contradictory?

295
00:27:55,551 --> 00:28:08,550
The basic idea behind radiocarbon dating is that radioactive carbon decays at a set rate, and you can use that to date when various animals and life forms died and how long they've been dead.

296
00:28:08,550 --> 00:28:12,550
However, there are known flaws in the science.

297
00:28:12,550 --> 00:28:22,549
Inorganic materials, like stone, cannot be carbon dated, and exposure to radioactivity can alter the dates dramatically.

298
00:28:23,549 --> 00:28:29,549
The dating may abruptly increase because of nuclear weapons going on.

299
00:28:29,549 --> 00:28:42,548
It's also changed if a volcano erupts, it puts a lot of carbon dioxide in the air, but scientists crave certainty, like all human beings, certainty and predictability, so they tend to minimize the caveats.

300
00:28:43,548 --> 00:28:55,547
But if the carbon measurements can be skewed due to exposure to radiation, just how inaccurate might the dating be?

301
00:28:55,547 --> 00:29:03,547
Perhaps answers can be found when the process is put to yet another, even more confounding test.

302
00:29:03,547 --> 00:29:09,546
Irvine, California, April 2017

303
00:29:09,546 --> 00:29:24,545
Ancient astronaut theorist, Georgiosuchlos, is visiting the Keck Carbon Cycle Research Lab at the University of California to see firsthand how radiation can dramatically alter the results of carbon dating.

304
00:29:24,545 --> 00:29:27,545
Dr. Southen, I'm Georgio, pleasure to meet you.

305
00:29:27,545 --> 00:29:28,545
How are you doing?

306
00:29:28,545 --> 00:29:29,545
Pleasure to meet you.

307
00:29:29,545 --> 00:29:31,545
I'm here to learn about carbon dating.

308
00:29:31,545 --> 00:29:33,545
Let me show you how this thing works.

309
00:29:33,545 --> 00:29:34,545
Follow me.

310
00:29:35,545 --> 00:29:49,544
Dr. John Southen is using accelerator mass spectrometry equipment to carbon data sample of redwood that was exposed to radiation during the testing of atomic weapons in the 1950s.

311
00:29:50,544 --> 00:29:59,543
The process begins by sterilizing the wood chip and then exposing it to various chemical processes to remove any contamination.

312
00:30:00,543 --> 00:30:07,543
The material undergoes a combustion process and is reduced to graphite for optimal data retrieval.

313
00:30:08,543 --> 00:30:17,542
Finally, the graphite is sent through an accelerated mass spectrometer to measure the rate of radiocarbon decay and generate the age of the object.

314
00:30:19,542 --> 00:30:20,542
Pull up a chair.

315
00:30:20,542 --> 00:30:21,542
All right.

316
00:30:24,542 --> 00:30:26,542
So what are we looking at here?

317
00:30:26,542 --> 00:30:29,541
Okay, so this is our result here.

318
00:30:30,541 --> 00:30:36,541
This is how much radiocarbon was in the samples that we've measured from that redwood.

319
00:30:36,541 --> 00:30:37,541
Okay.

320
00:30:37,541 --> 00:30:49,540
And the thing that's strange about them is that the radiocarbon age is negative, which means at least at face value, these are from 600 years in the future.

321
00:30:50,540 --> 00:30:51,540
Really?

322
00:30:51,540 --> 00:30:52,540
Okay.

323
00:30:52,540 --> 00:31:01,540
And the explanation for that has to do with nuclear weapons testing in the atmosphere in the 1950s and 1960s.

324
00:31:02,539 --> 00:31:03,539
This is amazing.

325
00:31:03,539 --> 00:31:16,539
In your estimation, do you think that if an object is closer, let's say, to a nuclear testing site, that an item like that would be yielding more crazy results?

326
00:31:16,539 --> 00:31:18,538
If it was really close, yes.

327
00:31:18,538 --> 00:31:19,538
Okay.

328
00:31:19,538 --> 00:31:26,538
So it would give you dates that would be the equivalent of tens of thousands of years in the future.

329
00:31:26,538 --> 00:31:30,538
I think that's so incredibly fascinating.

330
00:31:30,538 --> 00:31:39,537
If any object is exposed to some type of a thermonuclear event, it changes the result of the carbon dating.

331
00:31:40,537 --> 00:31:48,537
So I think that it's about time for us to look at our ancient history because what if something similar happened in our past?

332
00:31:49,537 --> 00:31:57,536
Stories of ancient warfare involving the gods using sophisticated weapons can be found in numerous texts.

333
00:31:58,536 --> 00:32:08,535
And ancient astronaut theorists have long proposed that these stories are backed up by physical evidence that can be found throughout the world.

334
00:32:09,535 --> 00:32:18,535
One curious side that seems to indicate some kind of atomic explosion is the very southwestern corner of Egypt.

335
00:32:19,535 --> 00:32:21,535
Right up along the border of Libya.

336
00:32:21,535 --> 00:32:28,534
And that area is a sandy area, but it is covered with evidence of vitrification.

337
00:32:29,534 --> 00:32:33,534
That's what happens when you detonate an atomic bomb in a desert area.

338
00:32:33,534 --> 00:32:35,534
It turns the desert into glass.

339
00:32:36,534 --> 00:32:47,533
And also at Mahendjidar, which is on the border of Pakistan and India, were these lumps of glass that had been molten and melted.

340
00:32:47,533 --> 00:32:51,533
And there were skeletons that were also found that were radioactive.

341
00:32:52,533 --> 00:33:00,532
So the evidence shows that there was some kind of atomic detonation or atomic war in our ancient history.

342
00:33:03,532 --> 00:33:09,532
There are suggestions that there may have been some past nuclear weapons detonation.

343
00:33:10,532 --> 00:33:17,531
And if that occurred, then the carbon dating must account for that possibility.

344
00:33:18,531 --> 00:33:22,531
And that would make, by the way, everything look younger in carbon dating.

345
00:33:25,531 --> 00:33:31,530
The oldest dates that can be measured by carbon dating go back to only 70,000 years ago.

346
00:33:32,530 --> 00:33:36,530
A tiny fraction of Earth's estimated six billion year history.

347
00:33:37,530 --> 00:33:42,530
Scientists have come to rely on the fossil record to fill in the gaps.

348
00:33:42,530 --> 00:33:45,530
But that too has its limitations.

349
00:33:52,529 --> 00:33:57,529
Myanmar, Southeast Asia, December 8th, 2016.

350
00:33:59,529 --> 00:34:05,528
Paleontologists discover a piece of amber containing the perfectly preserved tail of a dinosaur.

351
00:34:06,528 --> 00:34:11,528
Believed by mainstream scientists to be 99 million years old.

352
00:34:14,528 --> 00:34:23,527
The specimen is shocking as it reveals that not all dinosaurs were covered in scales as they had been depicted for more than a century.

353
00:34:24,527 --> 00:34:26,527
Some actually had feathers.

354
00:34:28,527 --> 00:34:32,527
But how could archaeologists have gotten it so wrong?

355
00:34:32,527 --> 00:34:37,526
One of the criticisms against the fossil record are the gaps in the record.

356
00:34:37,526 --> 00:34:42,526
That is, we can see what we think this animal looked like, you know, three million years ago.

357
00:34:42,526 --> 00:34:47,526
And then we can see what we think it looked like one million years ago. But what happened in between?

358
00:34:49,526 --> 00:34:56,525
Due to gaps of up to 80 million years, the fossil record is woefully incomplete.

359
00:34:56,525 --> 00:35:01,525
And the process of becoming a fossil itself is extremely difficult.

360
00:35:02,525 --> 00:35:06,525
Vertebrate bones are very difficult to turn into fossils.

361
00:35:07,525 --> 00:35:12,524
We are these wonderful picnic lunches for a lot of different creatures.

362
00:35:12,524 --> 00:35:18,524
Unless you fall into a water-filled mud bath or in the ocean,

363
00:35:18,524 --> 00:35:25,524
weaving your bones almost anywhere is going to make sure it's never turned into a fossil.

364
00:35:26,524 --> 00:35:30,523
There's life forms that have never probably ever been fossilized.

365
00:35:31,523 --> 00:35:35,523
This leaves room for all kinds of anomalous beings to really exist.

366
00:35:36,523 --> 00:35:43,522
We may yet find fossils of nine-foot giants and even of extraterrestrials.

367
00:35:44,522 --> 00:35:53,522
While conventional science remains resistant to the notion that extraterrestrial or hybrid beings have ever existed on the planet,

368
00:35:53,522 --> 00:35:59,522
ancient astronaut theorists believe they may be very close to uncovering definitive proof.

369
00:36:06,521 --> 00:36:10,521
Los Angeles, California, April 2017.

370
00:36:12,521 --> 00:36:22,520
After nearly two months, the results from the DNA test that was performed on a 2,000-year-old elongated skull from Perakas, Peru are finally in.

371
00:36:24,520 --> 00:36:29,520
To analyze the results, Giorgio enlisted the help of Dr. Todd Disotel.

372
00:36:30,520 --> 00:36:32,520
All right Todd, you got the results?

373
00:36:33,519 --> 00:36:36,519
Yeah, man, they're very, very interesting.

374
00:36:43,519 --> 00:36:47,519
Los Angeles, California, April 2017.

375
00:36:48,519 --> 00:36:50,518
All right Todd, you got the results?

376
00:36:50,518 --> 00:36:53,518
Yeah, man, they're very, very interesting.

377
00:36:54,518 --> 00:37:04,518
Giorgio Suclos is online with anthropologist Dr. Todd Disotel to receive the results of a DNA test that was performed on an elongated skull.

378
00:37:05,518 --> 00:37:11,517
They did get a good, clean DNA profile from the maternally inherited DNA.

379
00:37:11,517 --> 00:37:20,517
So this particular specimen is actually not found in the New World, not found amongst Native Americans.

380
00:37:21,517 --> 00:37:25,516
And it's typically found amongst Europeans and Middle Easterners.

381
00:37:26,516 --> 00:37:29,516
In fact, the 100% match was to a Scottish individual.

382
00:37:30,516 --> 00:37:32,516
This makes no sense whatsoever.

383
00:37:33,516 --> 00:37:37,516
Really? In a South American skull? This is all very strange.

384
00:37:37,516 --> 00:37:49,515
That could mean that people from Europe got to South America, you know, 1500 years earlier than we currently understand that.

385
00:37:50,515 --> 00:37:51,515
That's amazing.

386
00:37:52,515 --> 00:37:59,514
Unfortunately, the condition of the sample did not yield any Y chromosome, but that's not surprising.

387
00:37:59,514 --> 00:38:10,514
There is between a couple hundred to a couple thousand times as much maternal DNA in every cell of the body.

388
00:38:11,514 --> 00:38:15,513
So what does that mean? What have we not found out because of that?

389
00:38:16,513 --> 00:38:25,513
Well, so one, that would allow us to definitively determine the sex and knowing who the father was would be very, very informative.

390
00:38:26,513 --> 00:38:28,513
Unfortunately, we're missing that.

391
00:38:29,512 --> 00:38:40,512
Do you think that a case can be made at all? And again, this is complete speculation that perhaps it is not necessarily human.

392
00:38:41,512 --> 00:38:42,512
Is that a possibility?

393
00:38:43,512 --> 00:38:48,511
Well, it's possible, but still we actually don't know what this is.

394
00:38:49,511 --> 00:38:54,511
Since we didn't get any definitive result, obviously a scientist always wants to try to do that.

395
00:38:55,511 --> 00:38:56,511
This is extraordinary.

396
00:38:56,511 --> 00:39:00,511
Yeah, but still leaves open the possibility of something interesting.

397
00:39:01,511 --> 00:39:07,510
Right. So I think that we have something here that definitely merits further investigation.

398
00:39:08,510 --> 00:39:15,510
It's worthy of study or opening up a new area of inquiry and some new hypotheses.

399
00:39:18,509 --> 00:39:22,509
The results confirmed the fact that there is a mystery there.

400
00:39:22,509 --> 00:39:27,509
First of all, we couldn't figure out who the father is of that thing.

401
00:39:28,509 --> 00:39:30,509
Number two, it has European DNA.

402
00:39:31,509 --> 00:39:36,508
Two things that make no sense and it had a missing sagittal suture.

403
00:39:37,508 --> 00:39:41,508
So I do think that that is an extraterrestrial skull.

404
00:39:43,508 --> 00:39:50,508
Could preconceive notions concerning mankind's origins be causing scientists to overlook valuable data?

405
00:39:50,508 --> 00:39:51,507
Valuable data.

406
00:39:52,507 --> 00:40:03,507
Ancient astronaut theorists say yes and suggest that the scientific community has been too quick to find answers when they should be asking more questions.

407
00:40:07,507 --> 00:40:09,506
Science has built this house. It's called the Standard Model.

408
00:40:10,506 --> 00:40:16,506
And unfortunately, this house has some big holes in its walls and we hang paintings over them, basically.

409
00:40:17,506 --> 00:40:19,506
And we try to kind of paper those over.

410
00:40:20,506 --> 00:40:23,506
We want certainty. We want everything to fit.

411
00:40:24,505 --> 00:40:27,505
But new knowledge always changes that.

412
00:40:28,505 --> 00:40:36,505
The model of thinking in modern day academia is that artifacts can't possibly exist outside of our chronological timeline.

413
00:40:37,505 --> 00:40:43,504
They decide it's easier to simply put the pieces in that fit and remove the pieces that don't.

414
00:40:44,504 --> 00:40:50,504
Scientists are far too quick to put a period at the end of the sentence.

415
00:40:51,504 --> 00:40:57,504
They're looking at a giant jigsaw puzzle with only a few pieces that are there.

416
00:40:58,503 --> 00:41:03,503
But they're drawing huge conclusions without really seeing all the evidence.

417
00:41:04,503 --> 00:41:09,503
And this is a problem in trying to reconstruct our ancient history.

418
00:41:10,503 --> 00:41:17,502
Science is about letting the evidence lead the investigation, drawing conclusions based upon what you find.

419
00:41:18,502 --> 00:41:20,502
And the findings are undeniable.

420
00:41:21,502 --> 00:41:25,502
We are not alone. Exitrestral human-like groups have been visiting us all along.

421
00:41:28,502 --> 00:41:34,501
Are we now entering a new age of science where we will be forced to rewrite our history books?

422
00:41:35,501 --> 00:41:43,501
Perhaps we are finally getting close to finding the answers to the questions that mankind has been asking for centuries.

423
00:41:44,501 --> 00:41:52,500
Where did we come from? Why are we here? And are we alone in the universe?